Fator P® evaluation, an organic additive, in the fee

Autores/as

  • A. L. M. C. Nascimento Universidade de Franca – UNIFRAN - Franca, SP, Brazil
  • W. L. P. Araújo Premix, Departamento de Pesquisa, Desenvolvimento e Inovação (PD&I), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
  • A. P. D'Aurea Premix, Departamento de Pesquisa, Desenvolvimento e Inovação (PD&I), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
  • L. E. Ferreira Premix, Departamento de Pesquisa, Desenvolvimento e Inovação (PD&I), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
  • L. B. Fernandes Premix, Departamento de Pesquisa, Desenvolvimento e Inovação (PD&I), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
  • R. F. Silveira Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP - Tupã, SP, Brasil Brazil
  • R. P. Mendonça Universidade de Franca – UNIFRAN - Franca, SP, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17523/bia.2025.v82.e1941

Palabras clave:

Acaricide efficacy, alternative control, animal nutrition

Resumen

Due the losses caused by the Rhipicephalus (boophilus) microplus tick in dairy cattle in several countries, this research evaluated the action of Factor P® as an aid in this ectoparasite control. This organic additive is supplied daily in the diet through supplementation. For this, 20 lactating Holstein cows were selected. The animals were divided into two groups, Treated Group (TG) and Control Group (CG). The animals were stratified based on the count of telegynes above 4.5 mm, present on the left side of each animal. To evaluate the action of the additive, counts were performed on days 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 57, 86, 115, 144, 172, 200, 227, 254 and 281 after the beginning of treatment. Over the 281 days, the control group received 28 sprays and the group treated with Factor P® received 10 sprays, 64% fewer interventions. Thus, it is concluded that the additive had an auxiliary effect in the control of bovine ticks, reducing the percentage of infestation, the use of acaricides and reducing additional management, favoring animal and environmental well-being with cost reduction, since using the additive Factor P®, the milk doesn't need to be discarded as in the case of conventional treatment.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

ABOELHADID, S. M.; ARAFA, W. M.; MAHROUS, L. N.; FAHMY, M. M.; KAMEL, A. A. Molecular detection of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus resistance against deltamethrin in middle Egypt. Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports, v. 13, p. 198–204. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2018.06.008

ALMEIDA JUNIOR, S.; OZELIN, S. Fundamentos de controle de qualiade na produção, beneficiamento e industrialização do leite bovino. Revista Investigação, v. 16, n.8, p. 76–81, 2017. https://doi.org/10.26843/investigacao.v16i8.1833

ANDREOTTI, R.; GARCIA, M. V.; REIS, F. A.; RODRIGUES, V. D. S.; BARROS, J. C. Controle de carrapatos em sistemas de produção de bovinos associado ao manejo nutricional no campo. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2019. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1107106

BARRETA, D. A.; NOTTAR, L. A.; SEGAT, J. C.; BARETTA, D. Production, nutritive value and estimated milk yield from intercropped pastures of cold season. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, v. 72, p. 599–606, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-11436

BECK, B. M.; SILVA, D. J. C.; FASOLO, R.; SERPA, N. P.; MENDES, A. A. Analysis of logistics management and of relationships between fridge and of beef cattle supplier. Exacta EP – Production Engineering. v. 19, n. 2, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5585/exactaep.2021.13236

BURDICK SANCHEZ, N. C.; BROADWAY, P. R.; CARROLL, J. A. Pre-and probiotic effects on innate immunity and metabolism in cattle and swine. In: Gut Microbiota, Immunity, and Health in Production Animals. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. p. 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90303-9_14

CRUZ, B. C.; LIMA MENDES, A. F.; MACIEL, W. G.; SANTOS, I. B.; GOMES, L. V. C.; FELIPPELLI, G.; TEIXEIRA, W. F. P.; FERREIRA, L. L.; SOARES, V. E.; LOPES, W. D. Z.; COSTA, A. J.; OLIVEIRA, G. P. Biological parameters for Rhipicephalus microplus in the field and laboratory and estimation of its annual number of generations in a tropical region. Parasitology Research, v. 119, n.8, p.2421–2430, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06758-5

DOLENGA, C. J. R.; ANJOS, A. D.; BARBOSA, V. H. G.; YOSHITANI, U. Y.; CASTILHO, P. L. D. S. P.; MIYAKAWA, V. I.; MOLENTO, M. B. Acaricidal effect of major compounds to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in dairy cows and possible alternatives for reversing multidrug resistance. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, v. 31, n. 2, p. e005422, 2022.

DE MENDONÇA, A. É.; MOREIRA, R. G.; AMARAL, M. D. P. H.; OLIVEIRA MONTEIRO, C. M.; MELLO, V.; VILELA, F. M. P.; CHAGAS, E. F. Entomopathogenic nematodes in pharmaceutical formulations for Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) control: In vitro evaluation of compatibility, thermotolerance, and efficiency. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, v.10, n.4, p.781–786. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.03.012

EMBRAPA - EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA. Anuário Leite 2021. Available in: https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1132875/anuario-leite-2021-saude-unica-e-total Access at: March 7th. 2021.

FIGUEIREDO, C. B.; SANTANA JÚNIOR, H. A.; BEZERRA, L. R.; MENDES, F. B. L.; SANTANA, E. O. C.; ABREU FILHO, G. Correlations between production and economic variables in dairy cows on a tropical pasture. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 40, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v40i1.39737.

GETAHUN ASEBE, Y. H.; BASU, A.; SHIBRU, D. Overview of the Biology, Epidemiology and Control Methods Against Hard Ticks: A Review. Global Journals Inc, 2016.

GRISI, L.; LEITE, R. C.; MARTINS, J. R. S.; BARROS, A. T. M.; ANDREOTTI, R.; CANÇADO, P. H. D.; LEÓN, A. A. P.; PEREIRA, J. B.; VILLELA, H. S. Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Parasitology, v.23, p.150–156, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612014042

HENRIQUES, R. F.; PEREIRA, F. B.; PAIVA, J. T.; SILVA, M. A.; MELO, R. M. P. S. Profile of endoparasites in dairy cattle in the microregion of São João del-Rei, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, v. 73, p. 25-33, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-12013

HERNÁNDEZ-ORTIZ, RUBÉN. Laboratory maintenance of rhipicephalus (boophilus) microplus. A Laboratory Manual on Rhipicephalus microplus, p. 30, 2023.

LATROFA, M. S.; DANTAS-TORRES, F.; GIANNELLI, A.; OTRANTO, D. Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in Rhipicephalus sanguineus group ticks. Ticks and tick-borne diseases, v. 5, n. 6, p. 943-946, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.07.014.

LEITE, R. G.; ROMANZINI, E. P.; DELEVATTI, L. M.; HOFFMANN, A.; FERRARI, A. C.; D'AUREA, A. P.; FERNANDE, L. B.; OLIVEIRA, A. P.; REIS, R. A. Organic additives used in beef cattle feedlot: Effects on metabolic parameters and animal performance. Animal Science Journal, v. 90, n. 5, p. 628-636, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13183

MIRABALLES, C.; RIET-CORREA, F. A review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay. Experimental and Applied Acarology, v.75, n.4, p.383-398, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-018-0278-3

MOLENTO, M. B. Avaliação seletiva de bovinos para controle do Rhipicephalus microplus. Ars Veterinaria, v. 36, n. 1, p. 01-02, 2020.

MONTEIRO, C. A.; CANNON, G.; MOUBARAC, J.-C.; MARTINS, A. P. B.; MARTINS, C. A.; GARZILLO, J.; CANELLA, D. S.; BARALDI, L. G.; BARCIOTTE, M.; LOUZADA, M. L. C.; LEVY, R. B.; CLARO, R. M.; JAIME, P. C. Dietary guidelines to nourish humanity and the planet in the twenty-first century. A blueprint from Brazil. Public Health Nutrition, v.18, n.13, p.2311–2322, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015002165

NICARETTA, J. E.; ZAPA, D. M. B.; COUTO, L. F. M.; HELLER, L. M.; ASSIS CAVALCANTE, A. S.; CRUVINEL, L. B.; LOPES, W. D. Z. Rhipicephalus microplus seasonal dynamic in a Cerrado biome, Brazil: An update data considering the global warming. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 296, p. 109506, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109506

SAAD, F. M. D. O. B.; FERREIRA, L. G.; ZANGERONIMO, M. G.; PRADO SAAD, C. E. Nutrição e imunidade em animais de companhia. Caderno de Ciências Agrárias, 2015. https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/ccaufmg/article/view/2813

SANTOS, G. B.; GOMES, I. M. M.; SILVEIRA, J. A. G.; PIRES, L. C. S. R.; AZEVEDO, S. S.; ANTONELLI, A. C.; RIBEIRO, M. F. B.; HORTA, M. C. Cattle Tick Fever in semi-arid of Pernambuco. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research, v.37, p.1–7, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2017000100001

SON, A. R.; KIM, S. H.; ISLAM, M.; MIGUEL, M.; NAING, Y. P.; LEE, S. S. Effect of organic mineral supplementation in reducing oxidative stress in Holstein calves during short-term heat stress and recovery conditions. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, v.14, n.1, p.156.

VASCONCELOS, V. O.; MARTINS, M. A. D.; OLIVEIRA, N. J. F.; DUARTE, E. R. Effect of ethanolic extract of Capsicum frutescens L. on adult female of Rhipicephalus microplus (Ixodidae). Parasitology Research, v.113, n.4, p.1389–1394, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-3779-y

VONA, R.; SPOSI, N. M.; MATTIA, L.; GAMBARDELLA, L.; STRAFACE, E.; PIETRAFORTE, D. Sickle cell disease: role of oxidative stress and antioxidant therapy. Antioxidants, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10020296

WHARTON, R. H.; UTECH*, K. B. W. The Relation Between Engorgement and Dropping of Boophilus Microplus (canestrini) (ixodidae) to the Assessment of Tick Numbers on Cattle. Australian Journal of Entomology, v.9, n.3, p.171–182, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.1970.tb00788.x

WU, D.; LEWIS, E. D.; PAE, M.; MEYDANI, S. N. Nutritional Modulation of Immune Function: Analysis of Evidence, Mechanisms, and Clinical Relevance. Frontiers in Immunology, v.9, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03160

Descargas

Publicado

2025-08-21

Número

Sección

PRODUÇÃO DE RUMINANTES

Cómo citar

Fator P® evaluation, an organic additive, in the fee. (2025). Boletín De Industria Animal, 82, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17523/bia.2025.v82.e1941

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a