Biologic additive in the sugar cane silage treated with urea

Authors

  • João Batista de Andrade Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Instituto de Zootecnia, Centro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Forragicultura e Pastagens, Nova Odessa, SP
  • Evaldo Ferrari Júnior Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Instituto de Zootecnia, Centro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Forragicultura e Pastagens, Nova Odessa, SP
  • Rosana Aparecida Possenti Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Instituto de Zootecnia, Centro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Nutrição e Alimentação Animal, Nova Odessa, SP
  • Frederico Fontoura Leinz Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Instituto de Zootecnia, Núcleo de Pesquisas Zootécnicas do Sudoeste, Itapetininga, SP
  • Diorande Bianchini Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Instituto de Zootecnia, Núcleo de Pesquisas Zootécnicas do Sudoeste, Itapetininga, SP
  • Carlos Frederico de Carvalho Rodrigues Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Instituto de Zootecnia, Núcleo de Pesquisas Zootécnicas do Sudoeste, Itapetininga, SP

Keywords:

silage quality and nutritive value

Abstract

It was developed three experiments at Instituto de Zootecnia, in Nova Odessa, to determine the quality and nutritive value of the silage prepared with sugarcane treated with 0,5% of urea plus biologic additive (silobac) and addition of 0, 40, 80 and 120 kg of ground corn ears/ton of chopped sugarcane. The silobac additive was dissolved with or without treated water. The experiments were executed in a randomized blocks design, with 4 replications. Intake and digestibility trials were carried out in 10, 10 and 5 days periods, respectively to adaptation, intake and collection periods, with female sheep. Silobac was not effective on the competition with yeasts of the sugarcane forage. On nutritive value there were not different between water used to dissolve the additive. The addition of ground corn ears improved de fermentation pattern and nutritive value of the silages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2013-12-02

Issue

Section

FORAGE CROPS AND PASTURES

How to Cite

Biologic additive in the sugar cane silage treated with urea. (2013). Bulletin of Animal Husbandry, 57(2), 139-149. http://35.198.24.243/index.php/bia/article/view/1398

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>